Poland's electricity consumption is constantly
growing as the country is developing. In 2010
our existing power plants produced about 157 billion kilowatt hours using
various sources of energy, like gas (3%), biofuels (4%) but mostly coal (88%).
We consumed about 118 bln kWh and exported 1.5bln kWh. We used to be the Czech Republic’s
and Slovakia’s main suppliers; the situation is
most likely to be turned around. By the year 2030 our expected energy usage is
going to grow by 54% so unless we take some action we're going to start
importing electricity, and due to carbon dioxide emission regulations it’s most likely to be the power
coming from nuclear power plants of our neighbors.
Let's start off with simple explanation of how it works looking at most
common pressurized water reactor:
The heart of the system is a reactor,
where uranium 235 is being bombarded with neutrons which make it unstable and in effect split
the atom apart releasing neutrons and heat. Those neutrons collide with other
uranium atoms, making them unstable and splitting apart , releasing even more
neutrons and more heat, and so on – the chain
reaction. This chain reaction is being controlled by control rods, and heat is
being collected by pressured water, then that water is being pumped to a steam generator, where its heat energy is being changed
into steam. That steam, which is pretty much
safe of any radiaton, drives turbine of the generator and is being cooled down
by external cooling (water from nearby lake for example) in the condenser.
If that still doesn't ring a bell, here’s a video
explanation:
Pretty simple, isn't it?
Then why don't we build one by ourselves?
Well,
if it wasn’t for the Chernobyl disaster we would
already have had one, in 1990 we stopped
building Żarnowiec power plant based on Russians technology, sold the
components as the public opinion was strongly
against any plans of atom usage. Why would
anyone want to live near a nuclear power plant?
The truth is we already live near them, closest one would be in Świerk, the south of Warsaw, it's a multi-purpose research
generator which produces only 30MW and is currently operating. If we look
somewhere near our borders we can easily spot some reactors.
But those things are
dangerous!
This can be compared to the methods of transportation where planes appear to
be horribly dangerous, while
statistically being the safest way to travel. It
may be scary since any failure may be catastrophic, but current technology
makes any errors impossible. Reactors are made to survive everything and keep things safe for the environment.
A good example may be Fukushima which failed in March 2011, yet
the technicians managed to shut the reactor
down.
What about nuclear
waste?
We already deal
with it as well, we're able to retrieve nuclear fuel by ourselves and already
store some spent fuel in our country as well. On the map
below you can see existing nuclear waste storage in Różan, the north of Warsaw.
But, ecology!
Compared to coal,
nuclear power plants cost pretty much the same but they do not produce any carbon dioxide at all and
relatively small amounts of waste. Of course, there are solar panels, wind and
water turbines but they're all pretty expensive. That would drive up
electricity costs and in effect everything else, it's not something our country
can afford. The only danger is radiation from
spent fuel or a disaster resulting in leak, but
as I said before, it's something we can prevent if we deal with it properly. If
we look into statistics we can see some interesting data, for example nuclear
reactors have directly caused the death of 31 people since 1957 (not including the estimated victims of radiation from Chernobyl),
whereas, for example, the
water dam disaster in Frejus, France in 1959 caused the death of 421 people.
Of course organizations like Greenpeace are going to be
against it by creating spots like the one below, but don't get fooled, they're
not doing that for our health and nature, they're
doing it for money. Modern reactors can stand
even more than this.
Questions:
1. What do you think about nuclear energy?
1. What do you think about nuclear energy?
2. Do you think the Polish government is
capable of building and maintaining nuclear power plant?
Sources:
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf132_poland.html
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf132_poland.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2012/aug/11/how-build-nuclear-power-plant-video
http://www.darvill.clara.net/altenerg/nuclear.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_plant - pic1
http://postcarbon.pl/2008/03/elektrownie-atomowe/
- pic3
http://www.atom.edu.pl/index.php/ej-w-polsce.html
- pic2
Nuclear power is an alternative power source which produces energy. Even though,it is not as common as coal-based energy,it has been used since the 50s. There are a lot of countries in the world that rely on this type of power,e.g. The United States. As with anything,there are pros and cons of using it. The main advantages are that the production is far more efficient and eco-friendly. On the other hand,the main disadvantages include it being dangerous due to leakage and radiation. I believe that it is inevitable to use the nuclear power nowadays. People are addicted to electronics and with new products appearing on the market,we use more and more energy every day. It is essential to invest in the technology to make sure that all the safety aspects are in place and horrid catastrophe like Chernobyl never happen again.
ReplyDelete2. I strongly believe that Polish engineers are capable of building a power plant and maintaining it. We are famous for our hard work but also having highly intelligent people. In addition,we need a power plant in order to become our own energy supplier and not rely on our neighbours. The Polish economy is expanding and we need to take advantage of it. The nuclear plant is a very dangerous project but if it is done right,it will bring long term benefits.
I am not convinced about this idea. Did anyone ever think from where we could have Uranium? Polish sources are not so big, so if you look at wiki, (http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uran_%28pierwiastek%29) you could see from who your country will depends in the future. I think better idea is to create power from renewable energy sources. Wind or sun will be forever, so why not use them?
ReplyDeleteI believe that nuclear energy is a good environment and not polluting source of energy. Of course, many people speculated that nuclear energy is not a safe - they are wrong, it is good, but on one condition: it is in good hands. The biggest advantage of this energy is that there is no question of gas and dust emissions that pollute the environment. Another advantage is that these are investments in the future for senile nuclear fuel supplies for a few thousand years.
ReplyDeleteA disadvantage is that not called hands can wreak terror and destruction - I mean the Chernobyl disaster which occurred on April 26, 1986. This incident is considered to be the largest industrial disaster in the twentieth century. You do not blame the machine - as many people believe - but guilty people who that night had performed a dangerous experiment which consists in determining how long in an emergency, after the termination of steam generators, turbines driving the reactor, the kinetic energy of rotation produces enough electricity for emergency control of the reactor. This experiment havebeen conducted two years earlier.
And there is one very important of which is necessary to mention - nuclear energy can be used for terrorist purposes - just to mention the attacks on the two cities - Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That explains it ...
In summary, despite its flaws, I think that nuclear energy is the energy of the future, not poisoned environment. It hit the spot.
I had to find more about the topic. I couldn't decide. It's a hard question and we should start to talk about it now, because in the near future we will have to, whether we like it or not. There are choices to be made and priorities have to be set.
ReplyDeleteI found more arguments for and against nuclear power plants, but I still can't decide. I'm going to think it over.
http://www.debate.org/opinions/do-you-think-we-should-build-more-nuclear-power-plants
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion the nuclear power is a worth considering issue and we should focus not only on the profitable side but also on the safety problem. From what I know it is based on the nuclear reaction, which
ReplyDeleteis assosiated with all the bad things that has happend on the Earth.
It is also used in many highly developed countries,
so it has advantages that overweight the safety disadvantage. If we consider what is good for Polish economy I'm against
developing the nulear power As Poland is a huge exporter of the coal(I also don't like how URANIUM sounds).
On the other hand, it is considered cleaner than fossil fuels and better by all accounts so why not implement it?
I think that Polish government is capable of building and maintaining nuclear power plant, they just have to plan this differently then other projects in our country, properly.
I believe that nuclear power is very useful in the future, because it can save the world from destruction. This risk is known, because it is very unhealthy, the example Chernobyl, but such incidents occur once per million. From time immemorial is not no accident occurred at nuclear power plants, even during the tsunami in Japan, there was such a threat, but nothing bad has happened. Apparently, in Poland there are plans to built such plants, and I think this is a very good idea because it will give us a peace economy in many hundreds of years.
ReplyDeleteNuclear energy is the cleanest form of power sources that man has invented. Despite the seemingly windmills are neither efficient nor cost millions a nice little profit they bring energy. Is reactors are safe? so each new design reactors other than the Russian YES. Are designed to quickly and safely they can be switched and did not lead to what happened in Chernobyl. Let us be clear. There, the procedure failed and after a power plant to enrich uranium had. Does Poland need a nuclear power plant? 3 times YES why? How many more people can bend the meltdown in the mines. How much can poison the environment burning coal. Are we ready for change? I think not, because the problem is the lack of education and people who are still alive stories from years ago stemming from the Iron Curtain.
ReplyDeleteNo nuclear power plant in Poland, in addition to financial issues is mainly due to public opposition. Society does not know the latest nuclear technology, applied security, environmental benefits and reduce the cost of electricity production. According to many proponents of the development of nuclear energy, electricity is the best form of final energy, which is the one that should reach out to consumers. Meanwhile, in our country, only a small part of the energy reaches the customers in this form. As many as 27% of the energy supplied to the coal. But this is not the end of the problem - as much as 97% of the electricity produced in Poland from coal or lignite. This situation is of concern, since the energy of the carbon is very harmful to the environment. Add to this the transport, which is expensive and this is what it comes with the most contamination.
ReplyDeletePeople should have access to reliable information and plans for energy transformation in Poland. Nuclear energy is not the only one less risk to the environment than the traditional sourced from coal. I think that right now the campaign and teaching in primary schools can bring us many benefits. With this procedure in the future, we can have society that would be able to take a decision regarding whether or not to develop nuclear energy. The protests would change its color with the only emotional substantive arguments invoked are those still in the 80 on merit.
The element uranium is very common all over the world as a source of energy gain, doesn't matter either it is West or East. Personally I support this kind of energy acquisition, first of all because this way is less polutting due to no carbon dioxide emission. We are living on the earth as guests, so why we are still talking about costs of something intead of trying to safe our planet, what should be the most important issue. The nuclear power is merely dangerous during serious problems, but scientists still work on it and contemporary reactors can not be compared with those from 1980's when Chernobyl nuclear plant breakdown happened. Actually that disaster began with a wrong decision and it was more human error than a real accident caused by unsuccessful technology, rather insufficient tranning of some people.
ReplyDeleteIf we finish whole coal supply on the Earth we will have to die and the fauna and flora as well. If only one nuclear reactor will break, something here will remains.
Do not think only about your fragile human existence, we are here just passing through. I strongly recommend a movie 'Home'.
Since nuclear energy is something which will obviously be needed in the future, the decisions should be made now. Greenpeace has some reasons to prevent building nuclear power plants associated with environment issues but we should remember that this will be the source of the energy which will be crucial one day, when all of the non-renewable sources of energy will be finished. Moreover, I am aware of the fact that it is dangerous but there are more dangerous and terrifying tragedies likely to happen in today’s world. Taking into account that the most influential countries of the world possess nuclear weapons and they can use them whenever they want, we should not be focused on the danger possible to happen because of the power plant which is obviously built not to kill anybody but to improve the world’s use of energy. A lot of countries rely on their nuclear power plants and we should follow their example. However, since polish government is really ‘complex’ I do not think that they will decide to build the power plant in the near future, as the fear is actually big.
ReplyDeleteWonderful blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News. Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Appreciate it. home invasion
ReplyDelete