Monday, 22 October 2012

Week 3 (22-28.10)


HOW WE WILL BE LIVING IN THE FUTURE
“Vision of the future due to global warming”
FIRST ATTEMPTS


Seasteading isn’t a new idea. Back in the  1960s, former British Army Major Paddy Bates and his family took over a disused  gunnery platform in the North Sea. Despite  the government’s protests, the  platform is still occupied by the Bates  family today – it is called the ‘Principality of  Sealand’. In 1972 a group of libertarian  idealists established the ‘Republic of  Minerva’ – an attempt to forge a society  free from government intervention – on a  reclaimed atoll in the Pacific Ocean.  But no-one has ever attempted anything  on such a scale that TSI is advocating.   Financial backing for such projects  is already materialising. A billionaire  businessman Peter Thiel, one of the  co-founders of PayPal, has put $1.3m  (£830,000) of his own money behind TSI and  its goals. The organisation itself was founded  by Patri Friedman, the grandson of the famous  late economist Milton Friedman. Much of  TSI’s vision resonates with Milton’s ideas but it will take many years before a  seastead is ever recognised as a sovereign  state, able to run its own government. In the  shorter term, it will fly a ‘flag of convenience’,  exploiting the open registry that currently  enables ships from one nation to be  registered with another and use other  nation’s flag. One company, Blueseed, founded by two  former TSI executives, hopes to launch  its own seastead by early 2014, flying the    Bahamas flag. Its vessel will anchor 19km off the coast of California, offering a place of work for entrepreneurs and scientists wanting to launch tech businesses who cannot obtain US work visas. Ferries will operate between the Blueseed seastead and the mainland, and internet links between this ‘Googleplex of the sea’ and the land will be maintained by high- speed laser and microwave links.  



OPEN WATERS
Dodging the obstructive visa laws of some nation states is the first of many potential applications for seasteading. Scientists could use these artificial islands as independent labs where research in controversial areas, such as stem cell technologies, could proceed unhampered. They could also serve as sites for private clinics, where critically ill patients could receive life-saving treatments that are yet to make their way through the tortuous approval procedures of some nations. Blueseed’s entrepreneurial incubator will be a retrofitted second-hand cruise liner. This is the most inexpensive seastead design, but is perfectly adequate for the sheltered, calm waters off the California coast. For settlements further out at sea, somewhat more rugged structures will be needed. The most sophisticated are the so-called ‘semi-submersibles’. These resemble offshore oil platforms, with buoyant pillars that extend far below the waterline but aren’t actually bedded in the ocean floor. TSI has produced a proof-of-concept design for such a seastead known as ‘Clubstead’ that would accommodate 200 residents and 70 staff. Most seasteads of this size would have to be moored to the ocean floor using cables. In deep water, however, this is impractical and so-called ‘dynamic positioning systems’ would be employed instead. Here, latitude and longitude would be measured by Sat-Nav and thrusters would then correct any drift. Semi-submersible platform designs offer high levels of stability in rough seas. This is particularly true when the submerged part of the structure runs deep enough so that the platform’s centre of gravity lies beneath the reach of the waves. Semi submersibles offer the best tolerance to extreme environmental conditions.. But even a structure such as this may not stand up to the most severe of ocean weather phenomena – hurricanes. A hurricane spits out destructive energy at the same rate as a 10-megaton nuclear detonation every 20 minutes. Faced with such a savage force, there’s only one sensible course of action – get out the way. And this is something seasteads are quite capable of. Given that hurricanes normally strike with several days’ warning, there’s plenty of time for a floating city to pull up its moorings, fire up the engines and relocate to calmer waters.

FISHY EXPORTS
As with any nation state, seasteads will import the goods they can’t readily produce themselves – such as vegetables and meat – while exporting their own produce. This might include fish and other seafood that’s farmed in giant nets slung beneath the structure – a practice known as ‘aquaculture’ – as well as minerals mined from the ocean bed. Perhaps even oil. Fresh water will initially have to be imported, but advances in desalination may enable seasteaders to extract drinking water from ocean brine. But how would a seastead be powered? One solution is an emerging technology called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC). This is an energy-production system that works by exploiting the temperature difference between the ocean surface and the chilly depths to run a heat engine. The heat near the surface could, for instance, expand the gas in a piston and the cold contract it back again, creating a cycle of movement, the energy of which could be harnessed. A useful by-product of the process is freshwater, which emerges in the form of water vapour given off by the engine. It’s hoped seasteads will generate most of their own electricity, using OTEC together with solar, wind and tidal power. In the future, there is no real limit to how big a seastead could get, so floating megacities are theoretically possible. Even skyscrapers are not out of the question, so long as the floating platform is sufficiently stable. However, there is little motivation to build skyscrapers at sea. People build skyscrapers because open land within a city is limited and expensive.. At sea, there need not be any fixed boundaries to the city. As a floating city grows, so the inhabitants will require transport to get around.

ESCAPING NATURE
While moving around the city is unlikely to present a significant problem, relocating the city itself to escape an approaching hurricane would become problematic. So very large cities could be equipped with a flotilla of escape craft in which the populace would literally ‘abandon city’ in the event of a major natural disaster. However, one benefit that a lack of mobility will bring is that inexpensive, yet high- bandwidth cables laid on the ocean floor can be used for the internet and other communication rather than more costly laser and microwave links. Seasteading technologies will be much less polluting than those typically used on land.  And bear in mind that resources will be in limited supply and so more expensive, which means there will be pressure on seasteaders to use less of everything. With its promise of new resources, living space, lifestyle and a flexible government, seasteading offers new horizons and new opportunities to a human race that seems desperately in need of both.


Sources:
http://www.seasteading.org/engineering/clubstead-design/ 
http://news.discovery.com/human/floating-city-states-move-closer-to-reality.html
http://news.discovery.com/human/floating-city-states-move-closer-to-reality.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasteading
http://youtube.com

Questions:
1.     Will those homes a wait for us in the future
2.     Would you like to live in the house like that
3.     How do you imagine your future life
4.     Do you think that technology required to build those platforms is available right now or it will be available in the future

11 comments:

  1. Oh this one is very interesting, so there are my thoughts on "first attempt " because i had the time to read only this one for now but i will read the rest of Your article later on and comment too.
    First of all why does US government has something to say? Sea does not belong to anyone (i think so), and there is no official regulation about what and who can do on the sea. After few first words of course i think everyone would agree that, this type of solution or i would even name it "UFO" since it's not yet officially accepted by the law - would be available or even targeted only for rich people, or sponsored researchers or scientists. But soon the time will come and this kind of solution could be a home for thousands. Now it's just a beggining, but try to imagine which country beside any sea will accept seasteads in their neighbourhood? I think these pretty luxury things can be a great topic for governments to start negotiations who and for whom is the ally and then the problems will appear. These seasteads can brighten politicians minds and they can start to plan water war - this would be a total madness, but this is how the world of great plans work. Yes i know it might seem funny what i wrote here but, this world stopped being serious 2012 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1.seasteading is an extremely interesting concept about which i must say i have never heard . i am familiar with the design of the oil platform hence i can understand the design of seastead. I believe that just like with the concept of the flight to the moon on your birthday,this fantasy will first only be available for the rich and famous. Nonetheless,i reckon that this invention and many alike will be seen in the future.
    2. I consider myself to be an adventurous person,therefore,I would love to live on the seastead for a while. It would be interesting to live on the open water. Of course, it would have to be somewhere where the water is very peaceful because I can't imagine the seastead in the North sea where you can be blown away by wind in few seconds.
    3. I believe that our future will be very much driven by the technology. Today we are pretty much lost without the technology, so one can't imagine future without it. I assume that most inventions will be directed towards gadgets and electronic items such as phones,tv,computers,and music systems. Brands like Apple or Samsung will do anything to be a market leader,hence ,we will see a lot of cool gadgets turning up on the market one after the other.
    4. In my opinion the technology to built the seasted is already available. As mentioned before,the seasted is very similar in design to an oil platform. The oil platform is a very complex,highly advanced technological invention which requires many systems to operate at once and often in bad weather conditions.Hence,the seasted will follow the similar design but with the different purpose. The main purpose of the oil platform is to extract oil from the seabed,whereas the seasted will serve as a home or exotic holiday destination.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Congratulation!That was realy long article, but interesting. In first chapter 'First attempts' there are more political problems and some history of seastananding ideas. It is guite boring, but this is only an introduction before great plans described later in a text. Rest of the reportage is briliant! Full of inovative technologies and hope for the future. I think this kind of structures are so expensive to built that even Bill Getes does not have enough money to realize it. But human race should slowly start to prepare for the end of present civilization. I do not mean it comes soon, but in one thousand years nobody can predict developments. If we begin to think early we will be ready on time. Many thousand people seastands will take so huge sources (modern plastics and high technologies) that it could not be fully finance by users. That is only survive technology, but we should have know-how. Simply we have to try to start from smaller objects.

    Questions-Answers

    Will those homes a wait for us in the future?
    Maybe for millions, but not for billions.

    Would you like to live in the house like that?
    Yes of course, it must be really interesting, but in a form as Mr. Patri Friedman plans. Living on this kind of ship for good will be terribly sad, e.g. no present fauna and flora, mainly artificial products or fishes.

    How do you imagine your future life?
    Probably I will die in maximum 80 years :/

    Do you think that technology required to build those platforms is available right now or it will be available in the future?
    Maybe in the future, but in a very distant future.

    ReplyDelete
  4. After reading the whole post I think it's already happening, and as I've already written, it will be available initially for rich people. Personally, I think i could live in such place only if fish exports would not be a nuisance to people, also if it would not be wet everywhere and there was no smell of rusting metal.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very interesting article and honestly I haven’t heard about Seasteading

    1.Will those homes a wait for us in the future
    I think that is a very realistic idea, but it will take many years before it is completed.

    2.Will those homes a wait for us in the future
    I think that would be an incredible adventure, but I wouldn’t want to live permanently in the open water, I could go there on holiday.

    3.How do you imagine your future life
    I have many dreams that I want to fulfill in the future, one of them is living permanently outside Polish borders, perhaps the Netherlands, Switzerland, it yet to be seen.

    4.Do you think that technology required to build those platforms is available right now or it will be available in the future
    I think that it is already available, but a lot of time will pass before the idea will be implemented.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that in future we will defiantly have more of those floating cities, mainly because of overpopulation in places like India. Making those would scientifically reduce pollution on mainland. As to using those cities as medical centers, I don't see this happening, costs of building and maintaining it would be enormous, making it unprofitable investment, plus the risk of hurricanes makes it a kind of "non permanent" facility.

    Personally I think, living on a sea must be very different from what we know. As to my living on one of them, I'd say it all depends, how comfortable it would be, but certainly I would love to visit that kind of city.

    I imagine my future life to be more and more technologically dependent, advances in all field of science will make our lives much safer and easier.

    Technology required to build those platforms probably is aviable now, but very expensive. I think that the costs of building them will reduce with time, (discoveries of new materials, or building techniques).

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1. Will those homes a wait for us in the future
    Everything is possible, but I wont wait for it. For me it would be nightmare to live in such thing.
    2. Would you like to live in the house like that
    As I said before, I would not like to live in the "house" like that. FOr me it is a prison, which bars are made from water. I'm not mermaid, I don't want to live on or under water.
    3. How do you imagine your future life
    It is not much different from what I have now, and I will be very happy if it wouldn't change much.
    4. Do you think that technology required to build those platforms is available right now or it will be available in the future
    I think it is depend on who is asking and how much can pay :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't think so, because considering the ever deepening financial crisis around the world, it would be really hard to find the money for the project.

    No, because I prefer more traditional apartments, personally furnished and overlooking the garden.

    My future life, hmm, I guess I'd like to find a well-paid job, settle down in a house I'm currently building and start a warm, loving family.

    I think so, because when building houses as modern as this one, the biggest problem, is money.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I like the idea with the questions at the end, certainly will help commenters stay on topic ;)

    1. Possibly, there may be need for home for political outsiders and people who don't really like to live on land.
    2. No, I don't really like being separated from other communities by sea (even living on an island is not for me), im definitely a landlubber.
    3. Living somewhere calm and safe. I don't expect much.
    4. We have the technology already, some willing people can make it happen in next few years.

    Also, I have similiar opinion to Grzegorz, as soon as you make sea attractive you will find the sea owners.

    ReplyDelete

  10. 1. I truly believe that everything is possible.

    2. Not really. Although I enjoy sailing, it would be a nightmare to actually live on the water.

    3. Definitely not on the seastead. I'm the person who likes to have both feet on the ground. :)

    4. Our knowledge of technology is increasing very fast so I guess it will be available in the near future. The question is, do we really need this?

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1. I think, that those homes will wait for us in the future, because rich people would like to have their own countries without any laws, and taxes.

    2. I don't won't to live in the water-placed house, because I will be scared of tsunami and hurricanes. The second problem I think is that there will be no hospitals i range hundrets of miles

    3. I think that I will live in house near Warsaw, which will be mostly powered by solar energy and it will be very ecological house, because we MUST save our natural assets

    4. I think that we can build those platforms right now, but later it will be very cheaper, because now we have only one (?) of those platforms, so the cost of building it is really high.

    ReplyDelete