Tuesday, 15 December 2015

Week 11 [14.12-20.12.2015] Pets in Ancient Egypt





Pets in Ancient Egypt
The Egyptians are known for their deep appreciation of pets and birds, their gods were often given an animal form. But domestic animals, especially cats, dogs or monkeys, were so valued that their life was luxurious and sometimes they had their own burial and grave.

In the middle of the fifth century B.C. a Greek historian , Herodotus, visited Egypt. He noticed an unknown practice there , shaving eyebrows, which was a common ritual to mourn the dead. This mark of honor, surprisingly, was not for a dead person, but for a pet. Herodotus noticed many pet household in Egypt and people’s affection  towards them. He was startled that in homes where a pet had died, the whole family have their heads and whole body.
This devotion to animals dates back at least to the beginnings of the kingdom, when Egyptians had regularly painted pictures of their pets on the walls of tombs or inscribed their names on funerary stelae and sarcophagi. Egyptians believed that their dead pets would accompany them into the afterlife so that’s why they created statues, reliefs and paintings to commemorate them.
These images not only highlight the important role of pets played in their daily life, but they also tell us a great deal about the pets themselves. It has been possible to identify the specific breeds of animals that lived along the Nile, the extent to which they were domesticated, and even the veterinary practice with which they were treated. The most popular pets in ancient Egypt were dogs, cat and monkeys.
 


For the Egyptians, dogs were great friends and they accompanied in their houses and also during  hunting. Egyptian artists painted dogs on the most elegant tombs and the portraits were very detailed - body structure, coloration and special features. There were hunting dogs, guard dogs, house dogs, sheepdogs. Domesticated dogs enjoyed eating and sleeping with their masters.
Cats, were domesticated later than dogs, because it was the time of Middle Kingdom. They were judged as efficient hunters, killing smaller animals like snakes, mice and rats and other pets found in the houses and gardens of Egypt. Soon cats became an integral part of the household. Cats allowed their masters to collar them or tie eye-catching ribbons around their necks. They dozed beneath the chairs of their feasting owners. Later it was increasingly common to see cats represented on the walls of tombs. Judging by the images, these little animals had become the favourite pet of members of the royal family, Princess Sitamun or  Prince Thutmose. The great pharaoh Amenhoteph III ordered  the construction of  a magnificient stone sarcophagus with splendid inscriptions for Tamit, his own beloved cat.


Monkeys and baboons were well established as household pets. In tombs they are depicted climbing palms and fig trees to helps collect the highest fruits.
Pets in ancient Egypt enjoyed a  high level of care and a great deal of love. Most of them were strong boned and had glossy fur, which suggests a balanced diet. Household animals were considered worthy companions for the grave - they were mummified and  placed in graves with their owners.


http://www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/egypt/animals.htm

http://www.slideshare.net/recyclonesss/the-pets-of-ancient-egypt


Monday, 14 December 2015

Week 11 [14.12-20.12.2015] FWP Syndrome

FWP Syndrome

Have you ever heard about FWP syndrome? If not, let's read all the following situations and check if you are already familiar with them. I can bet you are!


·         You wonder why the Google Translator doesn't work on the binary code.
·         Your phone is dying, but the charger is in another room.
·         You've got the full fridge, but you're still hungry.
·         Your closet is full of clothes, but still, you've got nothing to wear.
·         You want to fast forward the commercials, but it's not possible - you're watching live TV.
·         You've got no Internet, because your neighbour changed the WiFi password.
·         You're not sure if you should eat breakfast or lunch after you got up at noon.
·         You came to McDonalds too late for the breakfast offer.
·         You're really hungry but also too lazy to get up.
·         You want to change a channel but also you don't want to move to get the remote control.
·         You poured  cereals into a bowl without checking if there's enough milk. There wasn't.
·         The software update requires to restart the computer.



You have probably already realised that FWP is no other thing than First World Problems syndrome. This term was firstly used in 1979, but it became popular in 2005 thanks to the social media such as twitter or tumblr, where it is commonly used as a tag to trivial problems. As the official dictionary states,  these are the problems from living in a wealthy, industrialized nation that third worlders would probably roll their eyes at. The use of it is aimed at shaming the complainer as well as it's recognized as good-humored self-deprecation. Nowadays this phenomenon is considered to be epidemic, especially in North America, UK and Australia.

The video presented below was made after the music video shown above gained recognition . It shows the citizens of the developing world quoting complaints. It is to increase common awareness of the problems that touch upon many people that are just like us, beyond the fact that they suffer from the lack of luck. Of course, struggles of people living in developed countries will never be the same as the ones of citizens of still developing ones; of course, we also have hard times, it is inevitable. But maybe, after realizing that it's not that bad, we will think 10 times before we get upset because Starbucks got our ordered coffee wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxyhfiCO_XQ



·         How familiar are you with the ideas presented in the song? (here you can find the lyrics: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/weirdalyankovic/firstworldproblems.html )
·         What emotions does the song evoke in you?
·         Has your interpretation of the topic changed after deeper consideration?
·         Has any solution come to your mind while watching the presentation?

Sources:

Week 11 [14.12-20.12.2015] Experiments

Experiments
An experiment is a procedure of a verifying previously stated hypothesis. By carrying out experiments, we gain knowledge about the world that surrounds us as well as the understanding of complicated phenomena. Manipulation with a particular factor with the minimalized impact of other ones leads to a cause-and-effect phenomenon. It means that a repeatable procedure is valid only when it is followed by the logical analysis of the results. Although the fact that without experiments being carried out, the world science would be years, behind without any chance to develop, still there is a bone of contention concerning the moral aspect of the presence of humans in these procedures. These experiments are sometimes considered to be inhumane and unethical; yet, many scientists use this way of gaining knowledge as  practical tests are much more reliable than theoretical hypotheses. Controversial ways create groundbreaking discoveries! Let's take a look at some most notorious and appealing ones.

Stanford Prison Experiment



I can bet that you have come across this experiment not only once. If not, an award-winning movie based on this story 'Stanford Prison Experiment' is worth watching. It is not considered a thriller for nothing. A Stanford professor, Dr. Philip Zimbardo, and his colleagues with the essential help of local police created a simulated jail. Volunteers chosen from mid-class were randomly divided into two groups: prisoners and guards. The aim of this scientific study was to examine the source of abusive behaviour in the prison system. No-one had ever expected this turn of events. The experiment had to be prematurely ended when the things got out of control. Usual mid-class students with no psychopathic tendencies turned out to be cruel guards, overwhelmed with their power sadists. On the other hand, the second group became submissive victims with the real feeling of guilt.


Milgram experiment
Exactly 10 years before Zimbardo's study, a Yale University professor Stanley Milgram, intrigued by how quickly common Germans became so cruel in the time of II World War, conducted a social psychology experiment aiming to examine the obedience to authority figures. The results were again world-shattering. This study consisted of one volunteer and one actor pretending to be a volunteer. The first one was meant to become a "teacher", the second a "learner". The teacher was supposed to ask the learner questions. The subjects believed that for each wrong answer, the learner was receiving actual shocks. In reality, there were no shocks. Subjects, against their strongest moral imperative, were able to inflict pain just because they were ordered to do so. Only among relatively small number of the subjects there was observed resistance to cruel behavior.


Do you consider the presence of volunteers in such experiments immoral?
What can be the effects of such experiments on the subjects' psyche?
Is it right to sacrifice a few human’s lives in order to improve lives of masses?

Sources:

Thursday, 10 December 2015

Week 10 [07.12-13.12.2015] The impact of refugees' crisis on the Polish economy

The impact of refugees' crisis on the Polish economy


The current hot potatoe is the crisis brought by the political discussion concerning the moral aspect of accepting an inflow of a great number of refugees. The European refugee crisis is first and foremost a humanitarian crisis. But it has an economic dimension too. Over one million of asylum seekers make their way towards Europe, including Poland. Obviously, the arrival of such a significant number of migrants will have an impact on the region's prospects. The thing is to calculate this influence in the long and short run. The predictions are not certain and there is no time to acquire experience by letting in  some refugees waiting on the European borders - the cost of such a delay is counted in many human lives.









The most common claim of the economists is the fact that Europe suffers from the aging society and it is a great opportunity to change this demographic trend. It is incomprehensible that the countries that refrain the most from the resettlement of refugees are the ones that might benefit from this movement the most. The Poles are afraid of the fact that newcomers will deprive them of work places. They will create cheap workforce. It is true but generally it is the way how developed countries work - Poles take such jobs in Germany and Great Britain. If Poland wants to catch up with Western countries, it can't close itself.

On the other hand, short term prospect is not that positive. It is obvious that European countries have to provide necessary conditions (e.g. food, shelter) . It seems to be a great sum until we look at the latest promises of the Polish government, which makes the crisis reserve a peanut in comparison with the budget deficit that is going to be created by unnecessary decisions being taken right now. Still, it is hard to predict the consequences. We can't be sure who is really right. The question is if the countries will treat it as a tragedy or rather as an investment.



What is your point of view on the economic influence of refugees on EU countries?
Do you think that refugees can bring positive change in the European societies?
Could you think of some other solutions to the problem of aging populations? 


http://geographyeducation.org/articles/teaching-about-syrian-refugees/



Week 10 [07.12-13.12.2015] Rain of Fire





Rain of fire



Recently the Russian activity against Syria became a real hot potatoe. On 31 October, when the Russian plane was shot down, a number of attacks increased as in this plane catastrophe 224 people died. ISIS emphasized the fact that they were responsible for this act of terror and they admitted that it was pure provocation of Russia.



A few days ago there appeared information that the Russians used a very strong chemical substance, which is called 'White Phosphorus' against ISIS. This kind of weapon is spread by the wind, so it is fatal in consequences. It can also cause water contamination. Victims die in a terrible pain. 'White phosphorus' is a substance, which cannot be put out by water. Many people burn alive. Not without a reason using weapons like this against people is considered to be inhumane. Most of the countries signed a convention which bans using this kind of weapon.



Russia is accused of misbehavior by some of the western countries. To what extent are people able to harm others in order to fight back?  Also, western countries still try to alleviate this problem without real actions, In their opinion, they simply don't let ISIS get away with it - with the fact that they took lives of innocent people. Much more humanitarian ways of fighting ISIS back used by countries that criticize the Russian actions don't seem to be as much effective as these controversial ones.



Does the events that currently take place are unavoidable?

Which way of fighting ISIS back should be continued - more effective or humanitarian one?






Tuesday, 8 December 2015

Week 10 [07.12-13.12.2015] Multiple platform design



Multiple platform design based on Windows OS

Multi-platform design is a popular direction for modern application development. A concept that arose with the popularization of multiple mobile devices like mobile phone, tablets and phablets is based on an idea, that systems and software should be written in such manner that it will work and look nicely on different types of machines, screen sizes and input types.

As the idea started with only the mobile devices, which was easier, because software for mobile phones and tablets were similar, it recently started to include all types of computers as well. In the last few years we could notice, that even the big companies like Microsoft started to use the multi-platform design for their leading projects - and that's, for example, why windows 8 and 10 appeared.

People argue whether the new direction is good for the users or not. When Windows 8 appeared, users encountered first big changes in how the new OS was meant to be used. While a strong complain could be noticed concerning the lack of start menu or the appearance of colorful tiled menu, the changes stayed and further  developed into Windows 8.1 patch.


Photo: mobileopportunity.blogspot.com

The OS evolved with each patch and so did the users. People started to see advantages of new, easily distinguishable icons and of new, better "search" functionality. The possibility of typing in the application's name instead of trying to find it manually in multiple "start menu" sub-windows became a powerful tool in hands of not only the professionals, but also the casual users.


Focus on casuals
An import target connected with modern application development is the ease of use for casuals. As the technologies popularized, more and more non-experienced users are buying laptops, mobiles and tablets and it is important for the software and OS to be intuitive even for a person that never used them before. There is a strong focus on meaningful icon creation, on gesture recognition (apps controlled by simple mouse/finger moves) and readability of the settings menus.

It is important to notice that casual direction, because Windows 10 shows us even more casual oriented changes. As it was recently mentioned, the main settings panel will be disabled and its place will be taken by more visual, simpler to use menu. Additionally, the tiled menu is being further developed, but connected with the old, well known start menu. It will be even easier to share our settings between our devices.

Photo: Microsoft commercial materials

As many of us are IT people, it is important to ask ourselves if the new direction is really good for us. 

How does the casual focus affect our development process?
Are the new menus really better than the old ones? Why did the "start menu" come back?